Korean enterprises are prohibited from importing physical dolls. The court commented that they are naked but not immoral

In recent years, more and more people are not shy about talking about sexual topics, and relevant needs have become alternative business opportunities. In addition, the outbreak of the COVID-19 in 2020 led to a sharp increase in sales, which made more people realize that physical dolls, and the price of such things also has a big gap. Cheap inflatable dolls are not expensive, but their appearance is also terrible; Expensive physical dolls are more realistic and can also be customized, but the price is also higher, ranging from thousands of yuan to tens of thousands of yuan, which is quite amazing!

 

Physical dolls are considered "immoral" and prohibited from import!

 

A Korean adult goods import company tried to import Shuruibao dummy last year, but was blocked. Because the customs decided that the relevant articles belong to this category according to the article of the Tariff Law that prohibits the import and export of "immoral articles"! The company's appeal to the customs was shelved, so it decided to appeal to the court!

 

At the beginning, the company was not satisfied with this, so it made a request for review. After the decision period was not concluded, it filed a lawsuit to the court to "cancel the reservation". They argued: "It cannot be considered that the dummy has seriously damaged the dignity and value of human beings. They are not immoral. It is illegal for the customs to violate the existing court decisions."

 

The court also accepted the company's claim and reiterated the validity of the ruling of the Grand Court. The court said to the claim that the customs believed that "the articles were made too carefully" that, if it were not for special circumstances, "physical dolls" were hardly likely to be confused with actual human beings, but were just human like figures.

 

Court Judgment: Ways to Achieve Human Dignity and Freedom

 

The court commented: "This article is criticized as seriously damaging and distorting human dignity and value, but it cannot be regarded as a naked expression or an indecent article. Related articles are used in a very private space, so it is reasonable not to interfere with personal activities, which is the way to achieve human dignity and freedom. Because it is a tool to meet personal needs, it can only truly reflect the image or attributes of the body - not just It is determined by the wording and nakedness that it will violate the moral concept. "

 

Although the judgment seems fair, the society is still very conservative. In 2019, there was a similar case. At that time, the court also made a favorable judgment on the relevant products, but some people still accused the judgment was improper. More than 200000 people participated in the petition of Qingwatai citizens demanding "ban on the import of physical dolls".

 

However, netizens said in succession: "If this can reduce the sexual crime victims' merits and virtues", "The doll's party is quite restrained when appearing in court", "I'm sure I haven't seen" Four and a Half Dormitories, Lost Youth "," The judges have normal thinking, what do conservatives think? "," The doll feels good, and there is no "indecent" look ".





--Reprinted from the public account: Entity doll combat experience